Hi Ranjan, Thanks for contributing to Fedora and maintaining packages. On 5/14/23 03:27, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > Thanks, Kevin! No problem, no rush, I did not quite know what to expect, hence the questions. Thanks again! > > It seems it is just the review that is needed: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_orphan_and_retired_packages/#unorphaning_and_unretiring_packages https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#claiming Generally reviews go faster if the person asking for the review does a review of another package - many people ask for review swaps on this list. For a package with a reviewer you can add NEEDINFO in bugzilla so that if an person has assigned themselves as reviewer does not respond after a while, a new reviewer can take it up. > > > > > On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 06:12:33 PM CDT, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 02:41:10AM +0200, Sandro wrote: > >> On 11-05-2023 17:57, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: >>> Still no movement on my unretire requests for both slim and oclock, not even a request for additional information. >> >> Tags have been added to the ticket. So, it has come up in one of the >> meetings. Supposedly, no-one has found the time yet to work on it. >> >> Feel free to ping in the ticket or bring it up in one of the meetings. > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
