On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 3:02 PM David Duncan <davdunc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Now that awscli2 is out and functional. Gwyn and I are thinking it's time to retire the original awscli package in favor of this one. We are thinking that it will be best to keep the awscli (v1) maintained until the release of F39 later this year and retire it from the active releases it at that time. If there is anyone taking a dependency here that thinks that they will need more time, please let us know. > Do you mean that we would want to have a Change proposal to retire it for F39? That's what it sounds like... > Nikola is working directly with Kyle Knapp, the cli developer at Amazon, on the python-awscrt (common c runtime libs) and the awscli2 and making great progress on getting a packit configuration in the upstream source for automating test runs and builds. It's definitely the better model. > Note that python-awscrt links to AWS CRT crypto libraries, which can be an issue when it comes to respecting system crypto policies. It would be good to have that resolved too... > Ultimately, I think that awscli should be an alias to the awscli. I'm not sure what you mean here? -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
