On Wed, 10 May 2023 at 11:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Especially not by making some small change contingent on moonshot proposals. > But I think that a) the current proposal is just a band-aid, and > b) to make things better we don't need to make huge changes. Okay, please open a _new_ change proposal with what you want to happen: expanding the scope like you suggest feels like me getting tricked to work on your much bigger change that's not terribly well-defined or tested. > ...Anaconda needs to *lose* a feature where it > refuses VFAT for /boot [1], the various places which create partitions > need to be modified to inject the right partition-type UUID instead of > made-up one, and instead of creating two partitions with different fs > types, create just one. None of this is rocket science. Perhaps you'd like to push this feature. I'd happily retract my smaller proposal if you've got patches ready for anaconda, have tested this on all platforms, and have all the votes. Richard. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
