Re: F39 Proposal: Make Toolbx a release-blocking deliverable and have release-blocking test criteria (System-Wide Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 9:11 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 07:57:30PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > I think we need some clarity wrt. to the dependency order here.
> > Let's say we:
> > > In order to do this at branch point, we will need to move building this
> > > image into the compose process and mark it blocking.
> > OK, so we build things, but then we need to publish to registry.fp.o,
> > which is asynchrounous (?). When we test the newly built ISOs, do
>
> No, it happens at the end of the compose (if no blocking deliverables
> failed causing the compose to fail)
>
> > we test them also with the latest image that we get from registry.fp.o?
> > And if we find a bug anywhere in this pipeline, we respin everything?
>
> Good question. I'll note that currently we do not do any specific
> testing after branch point. We freeze things to get a compose to
> complete, but then we move on. It's not like Beta or Final.
>
> > > I'd like to note that making this blocking doesn't waive any kind of
> > > magic wand that makes our infrastructure more reliable. ;)
> > > The container build pipeline is a long collection of fragile things.
> > > It may well result in us slipping more based on things not working. ;(
> >
> > Hmm, quoting from https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11092:
> > >> Also the aarch64 cluster is running on Fedora 33 boxes, so we
> > >> should probably try to do a full redeploy :-(
> > > We can't upgrade it from f33 because docker is no longer in f34+ and
> > > openshift origin / 3.11 doesn't support any newer either.
> >
> > Is this still true? I don't think we want to make the Fedora release
> > process contingent on something that requires F33.
>
> yes, it's still true. Note thats the aarch64 osbs cluster.
> The x86_64 one is rhel7.
>
> So, perhaps it would make sense to only make the x86_64 one blocking?

Or possibly build it with osbuild, the infra there is pretty stable
now for IoT, it's not perfect, but it does have x86_64/aarch64.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux