On 06-05-2023 18:48, Ben Beasley wrote:
I don’t think the PyPI parity rule needs to apply to the base package name, since this is primarily an application package and thus falls under the general naming guidelines[1]. You could make a case for renaming the python3-staplelib subpackage to python3-staple, adding the appropriate Obsoletes[2], and adding %py_provides python3-staplelib[3]. [1]https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_application_naming [2]https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages [3]https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_provides_for_importable_modules
Thanks for the clarification. It makes sense. Although, I'm still having a hard time determining what the primary purpose of a package is when it provides both, an application and a library/module, which can be used by other Python packages.
-- Sandro _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
