Sorry to hear about that! Hopefully you feel better soon. Thanks, I got downgrades to dnf, dnf-data, python3-dnf, tcpdump. No more. But I did update texlive-was to texlive-was-10. Thanks again! On Tuesday, April 25, 2023 at 01:52:29 PM CDT, Stephen Smoogen <ssmoogen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 14:43, Globe Trotter via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thank you for this! > > I set up > > > $sudo dnf reposync > > and it is going on to do some sort of download for 69,222 (!) package? > > Is this correct? I seem to think that there are a bit more than 2,000 RPMs installed in my system! > > I am perplexed, so I just wanted to make sure that this is what I should be doing. > No that is me typing instructions while on pain management medicine. dnf distro-sync is what I should have typed. My apologies for the mixup. > Thanks again! > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, April 25, 2023 at 01:17:56 PM CDT, Stephen Smoogen <ssmoogen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 14:13, stan via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:30:28 +0000 (UTC) >> Globe Trotter via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Is texlive-was-9 retired for Fedora 38? My package did not upgrade >>> from F37 and so I was wondering about it. >> >> As near as I can tell, there is no package in fedora called >> texlive-was-9. >> > > > In Fedora 37 base there was: > > ``` > /srv/web/pub/fedora/linux/releases/37/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/t/texlive-was-svn21439.0-59.fc37.noarch.rpm > Name : texlive-was > Epoch : 9 > Version : svn21439.0 > Release : 59.fc37 > Architecture: noarch > Install Date: (not installed) > Group : Unspecified > Size : 14330 > License : Public Domain > Signature : RSA/SHA256, Tue 02 Aug 2022 08:31:29 GMT, Key ID f55ad3fb5323552a > Source RPM : texlive-2021-59.fc37.src.rpm > Build Date : Mon 01 Aug 2022 16:30:45 GMT > Build Host : buildvm-ppc64le-37.iad2.fedoraproject.org > Relocations : (not relocatable) > Packager : Fedora Project > Vendor : Fedora Project > URL : http://tug.org/texlive/ > Bug URL : https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/texlive > Summary : A collection of small packages by Walter Schmidt > Description : > A bundle of packages that arise in the author's area of > interest: compliance of maths typesetting with ISO standards; > symbols that work in both maths and text modes commas for both > decimal separator and maths; and upright Greek letters in > maths. > ``` > > These were built out of the main texlive package. This package was also in the F38 repository > > /pub/fedora/linux/releases/38/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/t/texlive-was-svn64691-65.fc38.noarch.rpm > > so it should have been updated unless some other package problem stopped it. Try doing a `dnf reposync` > >> There is a package >> texlive-wasy-10:svn53533-65.fc38.noarch.rpm >> that contains >> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/source/public/wasy/wasy9.mf >> in F38. >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=33307983 >> >> Is that what you mean? It seems to be there in F38. Is it possible >> that it has conflicts, and so wasn't updated? >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue >> >> > > > -- > > Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive > Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
