* Miro Hrončok: > On 14. 04. 23 9:31, Florian Weimer wrote: >> What's the -p default for %autosetup? Without any -p argument, the >> patch command has peculiar behavior. I assumed that without -p, %patch >> would not inherit that behavior, and so would %autosetup without -p. >> Is this accurate? Or does %autosetup (or %patch) have an actual default >> for -p? > > Hi. > > %autosetup calls %autopatch and passes -p only if used > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/rpm-4.18.1-release/macros.in#L1279 > > %autopatch calls %__apply_patch and passes -p only if used > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/rpm-4.18.1-release/macros.in#L1262 > > %__apply_patch calls %__scm_apply_%{__scm} and passes options as given > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/rpm-4.18.1-release/macros.in#L1230 > > Default value for %{__scm} is patch > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/rpm-4.18.1-release/macros.in#L1159 > > %__scm_apply_patch calls the %{__patch} program and passes -p only if used > > Default for %{__patch} is ... probably /usr/bin/patch > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/rpm-4.18.1-release/macros.in#L47 > > --------------- > > Conclusion: No default. %autosetup without -p calls patch without > -p. Assuming you don't use %autosetup with non-default -S. Thank you, that was my tentative conclusion as well. Given the weird -p-less behavior, shouldn't we encourage to use -p1 (to match git) or -p0 (to match Subversion/CVS/RCS)? Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
