On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 4:15 PM Steven A. Falco <stevenfalco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm confused by the Requires for redhat-lsb-core. > > According to "dnf repoquery --requires redhat-lsb-core" there is no requirement for esmtp. But according to "dnf repoquery --whatrequires esmtp", redhat-lsb-core does require esmtp. > > Perhaps there is some sort of transitive requirement that the above commands don't show, but the curious thing is that I have redhat-lsb-core installed on my F37 machine, and that didn't pull in esmtp. > > Why do I care? Well, KiCad now Recommends redhat-lsb-core to help with upstream bug reports (wx uses redhat-lsb-core to report OS info). > > Since I added "Recommends: redhat-lsb-core" to KiCad, some users are now apparently also getting esmtp, which they really don't need/want. > > I don't understand that. Why are some users getting esmtp when they install KiCad, yet I didn't get esmtp when I installed KiCad? > > A bigger question would be how to restructure OS information gathering, since redhat-lsb-core does pull in a lot of stuff, but that is a question for another day... esmtp provides /usr/sbin/sendmail which is needed by redhat-lsb-core. However, it's only one of multiple packages that can provide it. If you already have one of exim, msmtp, opensmtpd, postfix or sendmail installed, then it won't pull esmtp in. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
