On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 10:49:33AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 30. 03. 23 v 0:08 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > > Additionally, the smallest offerings of popular VPS providers have > > just 1 or 2 GB of RAM, is Fedora Server no longer supported on systems > > like these? > > At first place - upgrades in cloud environment should be discouraged. The > standard should be 1) describe your system in Ansible playbook 2) terminate > machine 3) change in your playbook the name of new image 4) run your > playbook. This is how we upgrade machines in cloud in fedora-infra. I don't think it is realistic to expect users to follow such steps in the general case as plenty of cloud VMs are considered precious and not simply able to be thrown away and replaced by freshly built system that way. > And not sure if it worth a work (likely not easy) as the upgrades from F39 > to F40 will be done by DNF5 with totally different (smaller I hope) > footprint. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
