On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 12:30 PM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dne 28. 03. 23 v 16:01 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> Hmm, that'd mean thousands of pull requests… I think if we agree to
> this, it would make sense to just push a fix directly. Each pull request
> ticket is a few mails, and with 8096 expected pull requests, that is
> quite a lot of churn.
I am trying to be as polite as possible. And respectful to work of maintainers.
Rel-engs bumping release because of mass-rebuild is trivial thing and doing direct push is right thing.
But is the change of the license string trivial thing? I do not know. If most people (and FESCO) tell me "yeah, push
directly" then I can push directly. PRs are definitelly more work for me (and owners of this proposal). But I am willing
to do that.
Yes, please push directly. I completely agree with Zbigniew and don't think that PRs work super well for mass changes like this. However, this definitely needs FESCo approval first and communication (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Mass_package_changes/) before pushing.
Package changes are tracked in git and it's trivial for a package maintainer to revert it for an individual package if needed.
--
Kalev
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
