Re: F39 proposal: SPDX License Phase 2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 28. 03. 23 v 16:01 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
Hmm, that'd mean thousands of pull requests… I think if we agree to
this, it would make sense to just push a fix directly. Each pull request
ticket is a few mails, and with 8096 expected pull requests, that is
quite a lot of churn.

I am trying to be as polite as possible. And respectful to work of maintainers.

Rel-engs bumping release because of mass-rebuild is trivial thing and doing direct push is right thing.

But is the change of the license string trivial thing? I do not know. If most people (and FESCO) tell me "yeah, push directly" then I can push directly. PRs are definitelly more work for me (and owners of this proposal). But I am willing to do that.

Miroslav
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux