On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 03:19:00PM +0000, Maxwell G wrote: > On Mon Mar 27, 2023 at 07:27 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 11:57:04AM -0000, Aleš Matěj wrote: > <snip> > > > However you are right dnf can't handle that. It looks for deltas in the same repo where it finds > > > the normal update package. It would require changes in dnf and libdnf. > > > > ok. Thanks for the info. > > > > If we want to bring drpms back to useful, I think this would probibly be the > > best way to go. Then we could have some app that creates them async and > > dnf could use them if available. > > > > kevin > > Can you or someone else more familiar with DRPMs than I file a dnf5 RFE? > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/new Well, I don't know that I have any time to drive this, and I am not sure if it should be on dnf5 or libdnf or librepo or all of them? Anyhow, filed https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/408 kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
