On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 7:29 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 20/03/2023 17:08, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Going forward, I'm going to turn it into an add-on package, i.e. ship
> only the two plugins we can't ship in Fedora:
In a subpackage libheif-freeworld?
I think it would look cleaner to name them according to the plugins, so that it would be:
%files -n libheif-libde265
%{_libdir}/libheif/libheif-libde265.so%files -n libheif-x265
%{_libdir}/libheif/libheif-x265.so
and then add reverse soft deps from the newly added packages to the libheif package so that they'd get pulled in when enabling rpmfusion. Although thinking about it some more, there was a somewhat recent dnf change that made it not pull in newly added soft deps, so maybe this approach would not work so well after all, at least not to automatically pull in the extra plugins ...
Anyway, libheif-freeworld sounds to me more like something that would replace the entire libheif package with an alternative version. In this case, it's only two additional plugins and I think it would be better to avoid the -freeworld pattern here.
--
Kalev
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
