On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 6:32 AM Sandro <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 15-03-2023 00:34, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 7:17 PM Sandro <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Apologies for my late response. I have been swamped with other things... > >> > >> On 27-02-2023 16:05, Neal Gompa wrote: > >>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:04 AM Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Sat, 2023-02-25 at 10:27 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> > >> <snip> > >> > >>>>> > >>>>> It looks like libheif now supports a plugin architecture, so we could > >>>>> move libheif to Fedora, while having the HEVC/H.265 backend plugin in > >>>>> RPM Fusion. > >>>>> > >>>>> Also, according to the CMake, the HEVC/H.265 plugins are not built by > >>>>> default anymore: > >>>>> https://github.com/strukturag/libheif/blob/cdcc5b210879e0a0348032a594f8be52bb739c0d/CMakeLists.txt#L92-L98 > >>>>> > >>>>> So feel free to package it and bring it into Fedora. :) > >> > >> I'm willing to give it a try. Yet, just submitting the package and > >> getting it into Fedora is probably not enough. Some co-ordination with > >> RPMFusion would be needed, I guess. And consuming packages would need to > >> be updated to properly use the new library. > >> > >> If anyone could guide/assist me with that, I'd be grateful. > >> > >>>> So we can build libheif without H.265 on Fedora but how you propose > >>>> make H.265 available with one third repo ? just build the plugin on > >>>> third repo as a freeworld package ? > >>>> > >>> > >>> It may be possible to build the plugin independently and link to > >>> libheif, but at the minimum, that's what I expect. > >> > >> The above exchange I do not quite grasp. I guess this is about making > >> libheif-av1 (the Av1 only libheif, yet to be packaged) play nicely > >> together with the unfree libheif (providing HEIF/libde265) provided by > >> RPMFusion. > >> > >> To set things in motion I will try my hands on building a AV1 only > >> libheif package and take it from there. > >> > > > > Actually, I've got this done already locally. I can put it up for > > review and you can grab it? > > > > Then I can give you co-maintainer privileges for it. > > Sure. That will work. Thanks Neal! > This is now done with the new package heading to all Fedora stable releases and EPEL 9: * F38: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-00a7fd4c67 * F37: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-fca0992d0e * F36: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-30d47d0fcc * EPEL9: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5ac211d78f -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
