Hi there,
On 2023-03-19 08:14, Sandro wrote:
Dominik, since you picked up the RPMFusion package, which conflicts with
the new Fedora package, could you bring me up to speed what needs (is
planned to) happen with the RPMFusion package
The Fedora packaged libheif came through as a stable update yesterday,
replaced the RPMFusion one and broke my ability to work with any HEIC
encoded images with no way of installing a version that works from
RPMFusion.
I understand that RPMFusion is not an officially supported or endorsed
repository.
Given that there seems to have been at least some effort in trying to
coordinate this I was wondering if it was intentional to move forward
without having fully coordinated an RPMFusion split-package scenario?
Regards,
Felix
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
