On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 7:36 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 06:28:56PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I've spent the day fixing various issues in qemu on Rawhide, but > > there's one remaining issue. The tests stubbornly fail on i686. It > > seems as if there is some issue with TLS (is gnutls borked on i686?) > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=98075482 > > [Ignore the transient aarch64 failure ...] > > > > Why are we building qemu on i686? > > > > Although leaf packages can decide to drop i686 unilaterally, and I am > > sorely tempted, this is a critical package so I'd like to know if you > > have a valid use case for qemu, qemu-img etc on i686. > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval > > > > If we remove qemu it will likely have ripple effects through the rest > > of the virt stack, which we'll deal with (by excluding i686 on those too). > > Furthermore if we drop i686 builds, then I'd suggest we also drop armv7 > builds too. Neither arch provides installable media for Fedora anymore, > and QEMU doesn't ship any libraries which would be multilib relevant. > Even if there is a 32-bit library that is exec'ing qemu-img, that should > be OK with a 64-bit qemu-img binary. I'm not really sure which armv7hl builds you're talking about here? Support for armv7hl has been dropped entirely with Fedora 37: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireARMv7 Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
