On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 8:02 AM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 7:55 AM Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > pkgconf-1.9.4-1.fc39, comparing to 1.8.0-6.fc39, changed a soname without > > a notice on this list. Affected packages: > > > > # dnf -q --repoid f39-build repoquery --whatrequires 'libpkgconf.so.3()(64bit)' --source | sort -u > > build2-0.15.0-1.fc37~bootstrap.src.rpm > > perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf-0.11-11.fc38.src.rpm > > > > It also broke API: > > > > LibPkgConf.xs:246:23: error: too few arguments to function 'pkgconf_pkg_new_from_file' > > 246 | RETVAL = PTR2IV(pkgconf_pkg_new_from_file(&self->client, filename, fp)); > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > From an upstream changelog: > > > > * pkgconf 1.9.0 is the first testing release in the pkgconf 2.0 development > > series. While it is believed to be suitable for production, there may be > > bugs due to the overall redesign of the solver and other initiatives. > > Additionally, a future release of pkgconf plans will have additional ABI > > breaks for the libpkgconf library before the pkgconf 2.0 release is cut. > > > > My bad, I missed that this package doesn't have the soversion tracked. > I'll update the packaging for that going forward. > I've updated the packaging to track this going forward: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pkgconf/c/930106a9359d866a6591b27e797fd396b2013b08?branch=rawhide -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
