On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 04:44:29PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > We could merge current repos into the newly created one from pungi, but > > it would be a vast amount of work. It would mean all repodata would need > > to be regenerated. That said, it could be done, but no one has had the > > cycles to work on it. > > > > Maybe we should just publish into Pulp and have them do that bit for > us automatically. I wouldn't personally be comfortable with that until > Pulp is available in Fedora for people to easily deploy, but I know > the COPR folks are investigating it for their tooling. And the > AlmaLinux folks use Pulp for their system for similar reasons. > > Pulp is designed to handle super-huge repositories like that. I haven't looked at pulp in years... but back when I did it seemed pretty complex and heavy, but sure we could look at it again. I suspect some of the things we do wouldn't be to compatible, like bodhi injecting security/bugfix/enhancement data into repodata after it's made. In any case we don't have it now, so I still think dropping drpms for now is the way to go. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
