Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 3:37 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It's also been a long time since I've seen any benefit.
>
> Can anyone summarise quickly why delta RPMs don't work?  It seems like
> they "obviously" should be possible, because there must be a lot of
> commonality in the content of adjacent RPM versions ...

They don't work because we compose updates wrong. Instead of building
on top of previous updates, we throw them away and rebuild from the
latest. Since we don't merge previous composes into a new compose, we
are missing too much stuff for DeltaRPMs to be continuously useful.


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux