On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 10:19 PM Julian Sikorski <belegdol@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Am 20.02.23 um 19:14 schrieb Orion Poplawski:
> > On 2/20/23 10:46, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:43 PM Julian Sikorski <belegdol@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> FTBFS bug was filed against mame [1]. Unfortunately, the corresponding
> >>> build [2] has already been deleted. This is not ideal from maintainer
> >>> perspective as it effectively is a bug with no info provided whatsoever.
> >>> Not to mention being quite wasteful from the resources perspective as
> >>> mame builds take quite a while.
> >>> While not much can be done now, can we make sure that the mass rebuild
> >>> builds do not get garbage collected, or at least the build logs are
> >>> saved somewhere? Thanks.
> >>
> >> As far as I know, at least some form of truncated build.log used to
> >> get attached when FTBFS bugs were filed after a mass rebuild ... maybe
> >> this time this wasn't possible, because bugs were reported *weeks*
> >> after the mass rebuild?
> >>
> >> And I agree, having no logs at all for something that takes a long
> >> time to build is annoying :(
> >
> > Well, if your package is tracked by koschei (which I highly recommend),
> > you likely could get a current build log from there.
> >
> Good idea, this allowed me to get further.
> I have hit another issue:
>
> error: Recognition of file
> "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mame-0.251-3.fc39.x86_64/usr/bin/mame"
> failed: mode 100755 , dynamically linked, interpreter
> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2,
> BuildID[sha1]=4cb9f6821033586b869d516b865fa1d8e7b8b5f9, for GNU/Linux
> 3.2.0 Note section size too big (137005660 > 134217728) (Invalid argument)
>
> I am already building with -g1. What can be done about the error above?
> Thanks!
>
> Best regards,
Hi Julian,
This issue is tracked in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2167964.
Regards,
Lukas
>
> Am 20.02.23 um 19:14 schrieb Orion Poplawski:
> > On 2/20/23 10:46, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:43 PM Julian Sikorski <belegdol@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> FTBFS bug was filed against mame [1]. Unfortunately, the corresponding
> >>> build [2] has already been deleted. This is not ideal from maintainer
> >>> perspective as it effectively is a bug with no info provided whatsoever.
> >>> Not to mention being quite wasteful from the resources perspective as
> >>> mame builds take quite a while.
> >>> While not much can be done now, can we make sure that the mass rebuild
> >>> builds do not get garbage collected, or at least the build logs are
> >>> saved somewhere? Thanks.
> >>
> >> As far as I know, at least some form of truncated build.log used to
> >> get attached when FTBFS bugs were filed after a mass rebuild ... maybe
> >> this time this wasn't possible, because bugs were reported *weeks*
> >> after the mass rebuild?
> >>
> >> And I agree, having no logs at all for something that takes a long
> >> time to build is annoying :(
> >
> > Well, if your package is tracked by koschei (which I highly recommend),
> > you likely could get a current build log from there.
> >
> Good idea, this allowed me to get further.
> I have hit another issue:
>
> error: Recognition of file
> "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mame-0.251-3.fc39.x86_64/usr/bin/mame"
> failed: mode 100755 , dynamically linked, interpreter
> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2,
> BuildID[sha1]=4cb9f6821033586b869d516b865fa1d8e7b8b5f9, for GNU/Linux
> 3.2.0 Note section size too big (137005660 > 134217728) (Invalid argument)
>
> I am already building with -g1. What can be done about the error above?
> Thanks!
>
> Best regards,
> Julian
This issue is tracked in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2167964.
Regards,
Lukas
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue