Re: FTBFS bug filed, build already deleted

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:43 PM Julian Sikorski <belegdol@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> FTBFS bug was filed against mame [1]. Unfortunately, the corresponding
> build [2] has already been deleted. This is not ideal from maintainer
> perspective as it effectively is a bug with no info provided whatsoever.
> Not to mention being quite wasteful from the resources perspective as
> mame builds take quite a while.
> While not much can be done now, can we make sure that the mass rebuild
> builds do not get garbage collected, or at least the build logs are
> saved somewhere? Thanks.

As far as I know, at least some form of truncated build.log used to
get attached when FTBFS bugs were filed after a mass rebuild ... maybe
this time this wasn't possible, because bugs were reported *weeks*
after the mass rebuild?

And I agree, having no logs at all for something that takes a long
time to build is annoying :(

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux