V Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 09:20:20AM -0800, Gordon Messmer napsal(a): > For shared libraries without versioned symbols, the provides will change > from: > > Provides: libnghttp2.so.14()(64bit) > > to: > > Provides: libnghttp2.so.14()(64bit) >= 14.24.1 > > ... while requirements on that package will change from: > > Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) > Requires: libnghttp2.so.14()(64bit) > > to: > > Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) > Requires: libnghttp2.so.14()(64bit) >= 14.24.1 > [...] > Dependencies are generated using dlmopen() to locate a required library > named in an ELF header, and then resolving the symlink to a full path. If > the full path ends in ".so.x.y.z", where "x.y.z" is a series of numbers > separated by dots, then the numbers and dots suffix is treated as a version > number for that library. > I applaud the struggle for ensuring compatibility. However, I worry that it will make downgrading RPM packages less feasible. Imagine a user who updates a system, finds a regression in a library, attempts to downgrade the library and it will result into downgrading later-built reverse dependencies only because the library applied a (wrong) fix and the triplet has changed. Do you know meaning of the numbers? I only guess that the first number tracks incompatible changes, the second number tracks added interfaces and the last number tracks interface-irrelevant changes (fixes usually). Provided my guess is correctm would it make sense to exclude the last number from the RPM dependencies? I.e. libnghttp2.so.14.24.1 library file name would produce "libnghttp2.so.14()(64bit) >= 14.24" dependency. This less strict approach would provide users a freedom to downgrade/upgrade libaries without changes in the interface. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
