Hi Michel, Thanks for the feedback! On Mon Feb 13, 2023 at 08:04 CST, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > The subpackages command looks interesting, and potentially something I > can use in ebranch! I like it too :). > Can you use rpmdistro-repoquery's repo definitions? That would allow > dropping the embedded repo configs I'm not interested in adding a dependency on another repoquerying tool just to use its repository defs. If you want extra repository defs available in fedrq by default, I'd be happy to help you contribute them or do it myself if you let me know which ones. You can also configure other releases on your local system as explained in fedrq(5) [1]. I should probably flesh that manpage out a little more... [1] https://gotmax23.srht.site/fedrq/fedrq.5.html -- Best, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/They NEW EMAIL: maxwell@xxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
