On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 12:44:03PM +0100, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > I'm currently working on bringing liboqs [1] to rawhide. > > According to [2], I've added the following line to the spec file: > > License: MIT and Apache 2.0 and BSD 3-Clause and CC0-1.0 and Unlicense > > I doubt about 2 licenses that are enumerated: [3] (BSD-like) and [4]. > What am I to do with them? They look quite permissive but I need > someone's evaluation. > > [1] https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/liboqs/ > [2] https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/liboqs/blob/main/README.md#license > [3] https://www.openssl.org/~appro/cryptogams/ > [4] https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/liboqs/blob/40b01fdbb270f8614fde30e65d30e9da18c02393/src/common/rand/rand_nist.c#L1-L15 > > What is the proper line for the spec file and what are my next steps > to evaluate the licenses, if necessary? > [3] seems to be (BSD-3-Clause OR GPL) but unfortunately it does not specify which GPL to use, and the files don't actually carry copyright notices ... https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause.html You probably want to ask for review? https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-review-process/ Best regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
