Dne 11. 02. 23 v 18:53 Chris Adams napsal(a):
Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:Ben Cotton wrote:1–3. distribution — {Workstation,Everything,Server} boot x86_64 image exceeds maximum size — ASSIGNEDLet me guess, this is from the -fno-omit-frame-pointers Change? I have been asking for data on the size impact and I have been completely ignored both by the Change owners and by FESCo.
Kevin, if you are serious about this, then you probably want to analyze the size changes from the "Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230125.n.0 changes" email, which is the compose after mass rebuild.
Looking randomly on e.g. Coin packages, their size increased considerably: ~~~ Package: Coin3-3.1.3-33.fc38 Old package: Coin3-3.1.3-32.fc37 Summary: High-level 3D visualization library RPMs: Coin3 Coin3-devel Size: 47.99 MiB Size change: 4.03 MiB Changelog:* Wed Jan 18 2023 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 3.1.3-33
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild ~~~ There are also packages which shrank their size: ~~~ Package: bullet-3.08-6.fc38 Old package: bullet-3.08-5.fc38 Summary: 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics LibraryRPMs: bullet bullet-devel bullet-devel-doc bullet-extras bullet-extras-devel
Size: 764.79 MiB Size change: -3.96 MiB Changelog:* Wed Jan 18 2023 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 3.08-6
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild ~~~although the saving looks more decent. Generally, it seems that after mass rebuild, our package set is bigger by ~0,36%:
~~~ Size of upgraded packages: 147.51 GiB Size change of upgraded packages: 542.39 MiB ~~~But hard to tell what is the reason. If the GCC 13 or frame pointers or something else. I for one would be interested in such analysis.
Vít
If frame pointers blow up the distribution so much, I guess the best course of action would be to revert the Change and do another mass rebuild.Can you stop grinding your axe against a decision you don't agree with? You're just "guessing" with zero evidence. If you look at the bugs, they date back well before the mass rebuild, so there's no justification to guess it's the frame pointer change.
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
