Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> Ben Cotton wrote:
> > 1–3. distribution — {Workstation,Everything,Server} boot x86_64 image
> > exceeds maximum size — ASSIGNED
> 
> Let me guess, this is from the -fno-omit-frame-pointers Change? I have been 
> asking for data on the size impact and I have been completely ignored both 
> by the Change owners and by FESCo.
> 
> If frame pointers blow up the distribution so much, I guess the best course 
> of action would be to revert the Change and do another mass rebuild.

Can you stop grinding your axe against a decision you don't agree with?
You're just "guessing" with zero evidence.

If you look at the bugs, they date back well before the mass rebuild, so
there's no justification to guess it's the frame pointer change.

-- 
Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux