On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 8:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 06:31:21AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 5:57 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:55:50AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:38:38AM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > to return to the recent thread [1] "RISC-V — are we ready for more, > > > > > and what do we need to do it?": should we have a RISC-V SIG group to > > > > > coordinate and make it easier to find the resources? > > > > > > > > > > This is primarily a question to people who are working on this already > > > > > (David A., Richard J., others?), what would be useful for you. > > > > > > > > > > (I got my hands on a small risc-v board (StarFive VisionFive 2) and was > > > > > trying to get a new installation of Fedora running on it. It can be made > > > > > to work, but the docs are really scattered and partially outdated… > > > > > I was wondering how to get involved, and it's not clear at all.) > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/Z2RR2OE5TAQH5CVJ5VB5T3R7OM5ULYPQ/#O7IC6ZOH2RWWHG6F2UY4JGOU6HHMVFS5 > > > > > > > > I just got a VF2 as well (as in, yesterday). I'm still waiting on > > > > some bits and pieces before I try to make it work. > > > > > > > > I support creating a SIG. However note there are some existing > > > > resources available aleady (which need to be updated): > > > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RISC-V > > > > > > > > and the #fedora-riscv channel on Libera and an interlinked one on Matrix. > > > > > > Oh and I should add that we're even more interested in a CentOS SIG. > > > Whether or not this should be related to the Fedora SIG I don't know, > > > although they are very likely to contain the same group of people! > > > > > > > There's already an existing Alternative Architectures SIG in CentOS > > that could be revived for this purpose: > > https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AltArch > > > > It is moribund at the moment, but Pablo Greco is the "last man > > standing" and would be the person to reach out to for reusing it for > > CentOS RISC-V. > > > > But I wouldn't even consider contemplating this until you can get a > > clean Fedora build on RISC-V first. > > David is building Fedora 37+ for RISC-V: > > http://fedora.riscv.rocks/koji/ > If I remember rightly, this still doesn't build straight from Fedora Dist-Git as not all the RISC-V enablement patches have been upstreamed into Fedora packages. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
