Risc-V SIG?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

to return to the recent thread [1] "RISC-V — are we ready for more,
and what do we need to do it?": should we have a RISC-V SIG group to
coordinate and make it easier to find the resources?

This is primarily a question to people who are working on this already
(David A., Richard J., others?), what would be useful for you.

(I got my hands on a small risc-v board (StarFive VisionFive 2) and was
trying to get a new installation of Fedora running on it. It can be made
to work, but the docs are really scattered and partially outdated…
I was wondering how to get involved, and it's not clear at all.)

[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/Z2RR2OE5TAQH5CVJ5VB5T3R7OM5ULYPQ/#O7IC6ZOH2RWWHG6F2UY4JGOU6HHMVFS5

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux