On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 5:22 PM Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 7:26 PM Philip Rhoades via devel > <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > People, > > > > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for > > Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . . > > > > As I recall, in the beginning, Tenacity (to perform > most meaningful operations) required FFmpeg, > which was not in Fedora, so that was a clear > show stopper. Now that FFmpeg is (or at least > with the codecs without IP encumbrances) > Tenacity might be able to be packaged as long > as it does not include any other libraries that are > IP encumbered. Someone will need to perform > that IP review, as codecs are a minefield. To the best of my knowledge, Tenacity should work fine with Fedora's FFmpeg now. Tenacity's documentation has already been updated accordingly. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
