Re: Proposal: dnf should offer to update all of the dependencies of any package installed or updated

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:03 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 01:49:17PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 09:03:35PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > >
> > > This is indeed a shortcoming in the rpm symbol dependency generation scheme.
> >
> > Is it though? I'm probibly reading this too quickly and missing
> > something, but isn't the underlying problem here that nghttp2 changed
> > abi and didn't change soname? If they had, soup would have kept the
> > older version around, or asked to upgrade both libsoup and libnghttp2?
>
> No. libnghttp2 added one symbol, and (correctly, i.e. following the usual
> practice), it changed the suffix from .so.14.23.0 to .so.14.24.1.  (The last
> number is bumped when the implementation of existing symbols changes, the middle
> one when when new symbols are added, and the first one when an incompatible
> change happens, i.e. symbols are removed or changed incompatibly. Lower numbers
> are reset to zero whenever a higher one changes.)  The SOVERSION corresponds to
> the major number and does not change in the case under discussion.
>
> As Gordon wrote, our rpm dependency generation logic does not care about the
> minor or patch numbers.

If I understand things correctly, this is not entirely true. RPM
generates a dependency for the soname / soversion, and some projects
include not only X, but all of X.Y.Z in that, which RPM will happily
generate Provides / Requires for (whether that's a nice thing to do
for an upstream project or whether that's a bug in their build systems
I leave as an exercise to the reader).

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux