On 2023-01-28 10:22, Gordon Messmer wrote:
In order for rpm to do this, you'd probably have to throw out the current implementation of dependency resolution that provides "libfoo.so.2()(64bit)" and instead provide a dependency like "(foo-libs >= 2.4 with foo-libs < 3)", at least for the cases where libraries do not provide versioned symbols
...or "(libfoo.so.2()(64bit) with foo-libs >= x.y.z)", where x.y.z is the version of the package that provides libfoo.so.2 in the build root, which is an idea that's growing on me.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
