On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 4:13 PM Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 8:18 AM Arthur Bols <arthur@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 17/01/2023 14:57, Stephen Smoogen wrote: >> > So bodhi and pagure are at different datacenters with hopefully different >> > network paths. Could people do some mtr or traceroutes from their locations >> > so we can see if this can be ironed out. Currently the limited tools we >> > have in Fedora Infra for checking this all show 'green' so the >> > 'interconnects' between the services are working. >> > >> Fedora infra is usually very slow for me, but Bodhi seemed much slower >> than usual (taking a full minute to load). >> >> After being really slow, I had a bunch of 503's (not 504) for a while, >> but now it seems to work fine: >> - /releases takes 10 seconds (and had a 500 error once) >> - /updates seems fast with 2.2 seconds > > > I had some slow issues before the update to Bodhi but it looks like now I'm getting a different route and Bodhi is nice and snappy for me now. Things were similar for me - some queries were really slow and / or timing out earlier today, but now everything is nice and fast without any errors. So whatever it was, it was probably a temporary issue. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
