Am Montag, 9. Jänner 2023 21:02:48 CET schrieb Tom Stellard:
I think a good solution would be to move the proposal submission deadlines
a month earlier in the schedule. There's only 3 weeks between the
"Changes Requiring Mass Rebuild" deadline and the mass rebuild.
I don't think 3 weeks is really enough time for FESCO review/approval and
also getting the necessary patches reviewed and committed.
How would this have helped in this case? The original change proposal was
actually submitted more than 6 months ago! It is just that it took 5 months
to finally get to a vote (with whose outcome one FESCo member was then
unhappy).
The resubmission, on the other hand, happened one day AFTER the submission
deadline for changes requiring a mass rebuild and hence was already late
under the current process. Pushing the submission deadline earlier would
not have changed that.
If we need a rule, then it needs to be that rejected changes cannot be
resubmitted for reconsideration after the change submission deadline.
Though FESCo could just vote to accept the late change anyway, so it would
not really help if the resubmission comes from FESCo itself and if FESCo
really wants it to happen. At most it could discourage such late
reconsiderations.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
