Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2023-01-03)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Then perhaps the Change could have had a dead-man-switch built in:
>> unless performance improvements due to this profiling change do not in
>> fact appear by F39 or F40, the Change should be automatically
>> reverted.
>
> Question is how to measure that? Is it sufficient to fix one or two
> performance bugs to call this change a success, or do we need more?
> Specifically how many? [...]

If I understood it correctly, the claim was that enabling this
distro-user-penalizing option would make it back in terms of performance
optimizations.  That it was an investement that would have a positive
return.

Let's be firm in testing this empirically rather than aspirationally.

- FChE
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux