Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Then perhaps the Change could have had a dead-man-switch built in: >> unless performance improvements due to this profiling change do not in >> fact appear by F39 or F40, the Change should be automatically >> reverted. > > Question is how to measure that? Is it sufficient to fix one or two > performance bugs to call this change a success, or do we need more? > Specifically how many? [...] If I understood it correctly, the claim was that enabling this distro-user-penalizing option would make it back in terms of performance optimizations. That it was an investement that would have a positive return. Let's be firm in testing this empirically rather than aspirationally. - FChE _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
