Re: F38 proposal: Unified Kernel Support Phase 1 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lennart Poettering wrote:
> dracut uses fixed offsets for the sections to be placed in memory
> in. The values are simply hardcoded, literally specified address
> offsets, that worked for the original authors. This typically works –
> as long as your sections are not much larger than they were for the
> people wo came up with these offsets initially. But as it turns out
> this doesn't work for some cases. In such cases the sections will be
> loaded into memory overlapped and bad things happen.

Oh yuck! And the manpage is written as if dracut --uefi is expected to
work reliably. I see no big eye-catching warning that such-and-such
must be smaller than x bytes.

Björn Persson

Attachment: pgpoQ8OoPKmrz.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux