On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 12:15 PM Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mi, 21.12.22 12:53, Fedora Development ML (devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > On 21/12/2022 12:38, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > Why shouldn't FAT be used for /boot. In an EFI world, /boot > > > is used for the same functional pupose as the ESP, which is > > > already going to use FAT. > > > > Doesn't support links, lournaling and ACLs. > > What you want in a boot loader: native read access, write access. > Actually no, I don't want the boot loader / boot manager writing anything. > What UEFI doesn't have any understanding of and just ignores: symlinks, ACLs. > > What grub's fs drivers doesn't even implement: journalling, write access. > > hence, ext4 via efis might be OK as a compat solution, but it delivers > only stuff one doesn't want, and lacks everything one does want. > Sounds great! It means write operations only happen in the OS and nowhere else. That's what I want. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
