On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 7:17 AM Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 12:53:05PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 21/12/2022 12:38, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > Why shouldn't FAT be used for /boot. In an EFI world, /boot > > > is used for the same functional pupose as the ESP, which is > > > already going to use FAT. > > > > Doesn't support links, lournaling and ACLs. > > Is that something you need in /boot? > Yes, because content is directly installed there. > And journaling actually is more a problem than a solution due to > firmware (or grub) filesystem drivers often not having full support for > the journal. Luckily this is rarely a problem in practice because /boot > is rarely written to. > We could just make those read-only from the bootloader side then. I have /boot on btrfs, which grub/efifs doesn't support writing to at all anyway. Write grubenv settings into the BIOS boot partition or ESP rather than /boot. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
