On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 12:53:05PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 21/12/2022 12:38, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > Why shouldn't FAT be used for /boot. In an EFI world, /boot > > is used for the same functional pupose as the ESP, which is > > already going to use FAT. > > Doesn't support links, lournaling and ACLs. Is that something you need in /boot? And journaling actually is more a problem than a solution due to firmware (or grub) filesystem drivers often not having full support for the journal. Luckily this is rarely a problem in practice because /boot is rarely written to. > Everyone can do whatever they want with the files, Hmm? >From the booted system: No, depends on the configuration and usually it's mounted to be only writable by root. When you plug the disk elsewhere: Yes, but all other filesystems have the same problem then. With physical access to the disk only encryption can prevent that. take care, Gerd _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue