Re: F38 proposal: Upgrade ImageMagick to version 7 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2022-12-12 at 10:57 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImageMagick7
> 
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if
> approved
> by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
> 
> 
> == Summary ==
> Upgrade {{package|ImageMagick}} to the latest 7.x version.
> 
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:Ngompa| Neal Gompa]], [[User:Sergiomb| Sérgio Basto]],
> [[User:Carlwgeorge| Carl George]]
> * Email: ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx, sergio@xxxxxxxxxx, carl@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> == Detailed Description ==
> {{package|ImageMagick}} in Fedora is currently on the 6.x version
> series. The latest version series is 7.x, and
> [https://legacy.imagemagick.org/ upstream now recommends upgrading to
> it]. Some of this work has been verified ahead of time in
> [https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ngompa/ImageMagick7-dev/ a
> COPR project], which will be the starting point for the transition.
> 
> We will attempt to avoid introducing an <code>ImageMagick6</code>
> compatibility package, but if it is needed, it will be introduced.
> 
> == Feedback ==
> This was
> [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproj
> ect.org/thread/OO2IBDMPNSKAHCJF5QY27CNAJYAFPZBY/
> discussed on the development mailing list prior to this Change] with
> most commentators agreeing that upgrading the default package
> ("ImageMagick") and creating a compatibility package if needed of the
> legacy version ("ImageMagick6") is the right approach for Fedora.
> 
> The Change Owners privately discussed and came to the conclusion we
> should try this and proceed forward.
> 
> == Benefit to Fedora ==
> This brings us in line with upstream recommendations on how to ship
> ImageMagick, and gives users and developers access to the latest
> features and fixes being made available in the ImageMagick software.
> 
> == Scope ==
> * Proposal owners:
> ** Update {{package|ImageMagick}} to version 7:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ImageMagick/pull-request/10
> ** Rebuild reverse dependencies to link to v7 libraries
> ** Any packages that cannot build or be adapted to build for v7 will
> need to switch to {{package|GraphicsMagick}} or an ImageMagick6
> compatibility package will be introduced for them
> ** As much as possible will be done in a side-tag to merge into
> Rawhide
> 
> * Other developers: N/A
> 
> * Release engineering: [https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11185 #11185]
> * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)
> * Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
> * Alignment with Objectives: N/A
> 
> == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
> The main compatibility impact will be that third party packages will
> need to adapt to ImageMagick v7 or use alternatives instead. Within
> Fedora itself, these choices will be handled already.
> 
> == How To Test ==
> Install and use any of the packages
> 
> == User Experience ==
> This is largely an invisible change, so as long as applications using
> ImageMagick still work.
> 
> == Dependencies ==
> Reverse dependencies of the ImageMagick libraries.
> 
> == Contingency Plan ==
> * Contingency mechanism: In the event not everything can be migrated
> to ImageMagick 7, then the ImageMagick6 compatibility package will be
> introduced for them and they will be switched to that.
> * Contingency deadline: Final freeze
> * Blocks release? No
> 
> == Documentation ==
> N/A (not a System Wide Change)
> 
> == Release Notes ==
> The ImageMagick package is now based on the latest version 7 series.
> This brings new enhancements, including support for more image
> formats
> and features like HDR.


Hi,

I talked to Neal yesterday and the result is this proposal .

We may provide a compat-ImageMagick if it is need, but the proposal is
betting that we won't need it.
F36 and F37 are out of scope for now, after "getting IM7 in F38 will
let us see how things go, and we can follow up from there"

Also later, EPEL Steering Committee  will have to decide if want add
IM7 on EPEL 9 and 8 and how , or following this proposal or doing a new
package ImageMagick7

Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux