Re: Fedora Review Service

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I created the Fedora Infra ticket
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11028

Jakub

On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 1:00 PM Jakub Kadlcik <jkadlcik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > fedora-review require a lot of manual checks from reviewer (especially
> > licenses). It can't be fully automated.
>
> That's true but my goal isn't to fully automate the process. A person
> will always be required to take the final look and make sure the spec
> is reasonably written and the package is acceptable.
>
> I am looking at it the other way around. I did many reviews where I
> run fedora-review and it printed an issues section and/or some [!]
> checks, so I basically just copy-pasted them into the RHBZ as a
> comment and provided some context about them for the contributor. The
> problem is, that the contributor needed to wait days/weeks/months for
> feedback that CI could have provided immediately.
>
> My hope is also that by saving reviewers the time to point out the
> easy mistakes, we will have time to focus only on the things that, as
> you said, can't be automatized, and therefore cover more tickets as a
> consequence.
>
> Jakub
>
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 12:25 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 02/12/2022 18:20, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> > > I started working on a service [2] that listens to fedora-messaging
> > > and for every new RHBZ review ticket or a new comment with updated
> > > packages, it submits a build in Copr. Thanks to this [1] feature, Copr
> > > automatically runs the fedora-review tool and generates the
> > > review.txt file. Once the build is finished, my service gets the
> > > message and generates a helpful comment (so far only to STDOUT).
> >
> > fedora-review require a lot of manual checks from reviewer (especially
> > licenses). It can't be fully automated.
> >
> > But posting this as a template for the reviewer is good idea. +1.
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely,
> >    Vitaly Zaitsev (vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux