Re: Should the policy documents better reflect real package maintenance practice?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2022-11-28 07:36, Eike Rathke wrote:
 I would much prefer to see Thunderbird updated early in
Rawhide and releases that are not yet final, but to remain on the older
stable version for as long as possible on any Fedora release that had
included it.
That'd be a problem though because ~every Thunderbird x.y.0 release
includes security fixes, which are not backported to older then
unmaintained ESR releases by Mozilla.


I don't understand... When I said that I'd prefer to see Fedora remain on the older stable version "for as long as possible", I meant "for as long as Mozilla continues publishing security fixes for that release", which should be at least 12 weeks after a new stable release series (x.y.0) starts.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux