On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 05:44:01PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > The mitigation/successor strategy is to have comaintainers for every > package. > > Unfortunately our tools enforce the notion of a "main admin" and > if that person leaves that role has to be given to another > comaintainer explicitly. Thats due to bugzilla really. bugzilla only supports assigning a bug to 1 account. ;( > IMHO we would be better off eliminating the notion of 'main admin' > entirely and have all co-maintainers be at the equal level, so there > is no need for a dance to give packages to comaintainers. There > should only be manual action needed if the last comaintainer quits. +100 > A workaround for the 'main admin' problem is to have a robot account > as the 'main admin' and all the real people as merely 'admin', so > the main admin never leaves, but that's a bit tedious to setup. I agree, but it would be a good deal of work to switch to. I'd definitely like to do this when/if we move away from bugzilla. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
