On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 1:33 PM Bob Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, 10:09 Remi Collet, <Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> It looks like EPEL-9 is managed like rawhide. >> >> >> 1/ dav1d 1.0.0 update (also in F37) >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-40bb8ce9c5 >> >> This introduce a soname change breaking lot of stuff >> including libavif (from EPEL) and packages in RPMFusion >> >> 2/ libavif 0.11.1 update (only in Rawhide) >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-385df27ee1 >> >> This fix the issue with libdav1d, but introduce another soname bump >> >> >> This is a real nightmare. >> >> ** Please, manage EPEL-9 like a "stable" branch. ** >> >> soname change should be avoid, >> if not possible (security exception ?) should be properly managed >> and, at least, announced >> >> >> /me is disappointed >> >> >> Remi >> >> >> > > Those are my packages but I don't recall authoring such changes? I remember considering David 1.0.0 for EPEL9 but didn't do so because of the dependency nightmare. I assume the dav1d 1.0.0 update was accidentally merged from Fedora when building dependencies for rav1e. I've pinged salimma on IRC / Matrix about this, he pushed these changes. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
