On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, 10:09 Remi Collet, <Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It looks like EPEL-9 is managed like rawhide.
1/ dav1d 1.0.0 update (also in F37)
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-40bb8ce9c5
This introduce a soname change breaking lot of stuff
including libavif (from EPEL) and packages in RPMFusion
2/ libavif 0.11.1 update (only in Rawhide)
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-385df27ee1
This fix the issue with libdav1d, but introduce another soname bump
This is a real nightmare.
** Please, manage EPEL-9 like a "stable" branch. **
soname change should be avoid,
if not possible (security exception ?) should be properly managed
and, at least, announced
/me is disappointed
Remi
Those are my packages but I don't recall authoring such changes? I remember considering David 1.0.0 for EPEL9 but didn't do so because of the dependency nightmare.
Best regards,
Robert-André
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
