Re: SPDX - How to handle MIT and BSD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:05 AM Todd Zullinger <tmz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Am I missing something obvious or does licensecheck not work
>> as expected?  This is with licensecheck-3.3.0-2.fc36.noarch.
> 
> licensecheck does not follow/use SPDX-License-Identifier at all. It
> predates that scheme.

Then it seems odd to recommend it when someone asks "Does
licensecheck support SPDX identifiers?" I think.  :)

The answer is closer to: "sort of, but not really in a way
that helps Fedora maintainers do the SPDX license
conversion."

-- 
Todd

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux