Re: Direct to stable updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> Interesting.  I have never seen such analysis results
> shared (either the part about why maintainers do it,
> or the pushes being the common causes of bad
> updates), and of course, anecdotal experience does
> not lead to a supportable conclusion.  Where was
> that analysis published so I can read it?

It is empirical evidence only. (When something bad was pushed to stable, I 
looked at how it happened, and more often than not, it was autokarma.) There 
is not much of an analysis that can be done because Bodhi does not retain 
historical data.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux