Re: F38 proposal: Reproducible builds: Clamp build mtimes to $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 8:46 AM Clemens Lang <cllang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Alexander Sosedkin <asosedkin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > In RPM world, I've even entertained an idea of having a subpackage for
> > auditability not unlike how we have debuginfo, since rebuilding a package
> > reproducibly requires builddep pinning. But if that's avoidable, I’d
> > rather just not mix artifacts with meta.
>
> Debian is working on this already, they call those “buildinfo” files:
>
>    https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/BuildinfoFiles
>    https://manpages.debian.org/testing/dpkg-dev/deb-buildinfo.5.en.html
>
> If we want something similar, I’d propose not to completely re-invent the
> wheel.
>

We've discussed an RPM-specific format upstream. Debian and Arch both
have their own formats that are tailored to their package systems, and
RPM may have one too, eventually.


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux