Hi, Alexander Sosedkin <asosedkin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In RPM world, I've even entertained an idea of having a subpackage for auditability not unlike how we have debuginfo, since rebuilding a package reproducibly requires builddep pinning. But if that's avoidable, I’d rather just not mix artifacts with meta.
Debian is working on this already, they call those “buildinfo” files: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/BuildinfoFiles https://manpages.debian.org/testing/dpkg-dev/deb-buildinfo.5.en.html If we want something similar, I’d propose not to completely re-invent the wheel. HTH, Clemens _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
