Re: Direct to stable updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neal Gompa wrote:
> Bodhi is an unusually difficult codebase for what it does.

IMHO, the main reason the Bodhi code is so complex is because of all the 
policy that it enforces: karma (counting), update policies (minimum 
karma/time), critical path, autopushes, gating (automatic QA), …

If we would just let Bodhi do what the maintainer asks in the common case 
(i.e., no karma, no autopushes, no gating, just two buttons "push to 
testing" and "push to stable" that the maintainer can click at any time, as 
Bodhi was initially designed), it would be a lot easier to implement those 
few special cases that are actually needed, such as freezes.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux