Great, thank you guys, looking forward for it.
(I mistyped FC35 but meant FC36, not working with FC35 and not aware what's the state there.)
27.10.2022, 10:17, "Jiri Olsa" <olsajiri@xxxxxxxxx>:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 07:45:39AM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
+Jiri in To
Dave Stux wrote on Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 09:39:23PM -0000:
> I have opened bugs relating to bcc, and I see no reply on them.
> Currently, at least in my testing, the state of ,pst pf the bcc dependent tools in F35 is broken.
> Examples:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127642
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057139
bcc 0.22 is quite old and I think you have it right in this bug: just updating
to a newer bcc version would likely fix all these issues.
fedora 37+ have bcc 0.24 which is more reasonable and probably works, so
I guess it'd just be a matter of pushing it for f35/36 as well.
(note there's a bcc 0.25 that might be good for rawhide, but it breaks
API on bcc_prog_load_xattr() breaking e.g. older gobpf or bpftrace,
see https://github.com/iovisor/bpftrace/issues/2340 , so that one should
not be backported -- but I'm not aware of any such problem for bcc 0.22
to 0.24)
> I have filled non-responsive bug, but there's no reply on it too:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2136222
>
> Can anyone contact Jiri Olsa or update if he is out on vacation?
> Is there an additional package maintainer?
hi,
sorry for delay.. I talked to Jerome on Monday and he will
take care of that
jirka
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
